Part 2 — Long turnQ3/2026Difficulty 3/5

Describe a book that interested you

IELTS Speaking questions reported by recent test-takers, compiled each quarter. Cambridge does not publish the active list, so this is a compilation of reports, not official material.

Questions

Question 160s to prepare · 120s to speak

Describe a book that interested you. You should say: • what it was • what it was about • when you read it • and explain why it interested you

Model answer

Written by 8020 teachers. Do not memorise it — take the structure and the way ideas are developed, then speak about your own life.

The book I'll describe is Sapiens by Yuval Noah Harari, which I read about three years ago. It's a history of humans, but not the kind organised by dates and kings. It's organised by ideas — how farming changed us, how money works as a shared fiction, why we can cooperate in large groups when other animals can't. I read it during a period when I was commuting about ninety minutes a day, so it took me maybe five weeks, in twenty-minute pieces on the bus. Why did it interest me? One specific argument, really. He suggests the agricultural revolution may have made individual lives worse — longer hours, worse diet, more disease — while making the species more successful. I'd always assumed progress meant things got better for people. That chapter separated two things I'd been treating as one: what's good for a population and what's good for a person. I don't agree with all of it, and I've since read people who argue he oversimplifies, which he probably does. But it's the book that taught me a habit I still have — asking "better for whom?" whenever someone says something improved. I've given away three copies. Which is a slightly annoying thing to say about a book, but it's true.

Vocabulary you can use today

organised by ideas, not dates
sắp xếp theo ý tưởng, không theo mốc thời gian
a shared fiction
một điều tưởng tượng mà mọi người cùng tin
in twenty-minute pieces
đọc từng đoạn hai mươi phút
separate two things I'd been treating as one
tách hai điều tôi vẫn gộp làm một
he oversimplifies
ông ấy đơn giản hoá quá mức
better for whom?
tốt hơn cho ai? — câu hỏi ghi điểm ở Part 3

Common traps for Vietnamese speakers

Chọn sách bạn nói được MỘT lập luận cụ thể trong đó. Đừng tóm tắt cả sách — đa số học viên làm vậy và hết thời gian trước khi tới phần được điểm. Nói bạn KHÔNG đồng ý hết ("tôi đã đọc người phản biện ông ấy") mạnh hơn khen suông. Nó chứng minh bạn đọc thật, và cho bạn cấu trúc nhượng bộ. Kết bằng một thói quen sách để lại ("giờ tôi luôn hỏi: tốt hơn cho ai?"). Cụ thể hơn "nó thay đổi cách tôi nhìn thế giới" rất nhiều.

/θ/ trong three, things, author→/ɔː/âm cuối /d/ trong changed, assumed, arguedâm cuối /s/ và /z/ trong ideas/z/, groups/s/, weeks/s//h/ trong history, humans, habit — người Việt hay mất /h/

Try this topic and see your band

Record 90 seconds. You get four criteria, the exact words that slipped, and your own sentence rewritten two levels up.

Related topics